Brought to you byLONGITUDES
Blockchain hit the scene in 2009 with the launch of its first application, Bitcoin. In its simplest form, blockchain is a decentralized digital system of record in which untrusted parties can share a digital history and reach consensus without an intermediary.
It is comprised of a time-stamped series of immutable records of data managed by a cluster of computers not owned by any single entity. Each of these blocks of data is secure and bound to one another using cryptography.
During myriad conversations with global chief experience officers (CXOs), I realized that many of them are not fully confident in their understanding of blockchain.
Here are three of the most common misbeliefs and traps that decision makers need to disregard when considering blockchain for their respective businesses:
1. “Blockchain is all about cryptocurrencies, particularly Bitcoin or Ether. We cannot internalize cryptocurrencies in our businesses.”
This common belief is incorrect. Blockchain has several versions — public and private — and the most known examples are Bitcoin and Ethereum networks where everyone (nodes) has equal rights to transaction creation and validation, data access and producing new blocks.
Cryptocurrencies rely on the “public permissionless” version. There are other versions like “public permissioned” where anyone who meets certain predefined criteria can download the protocol and validate the transactions, and parties joining the blockchain network will need prior permission.
“Private permissioned” may be most relevant for enterprise applications with respect to privacy. Every node or participant in a blockchain network is pre-selected and validated. These are usually implemented in a consortium model and used for situations that require collaboration between businesses. There are no cryptocurrencies; mining is irrelevant here.
For example, an enterprise could set up its own blockchain network to accomplish network effects and obtain business collaboration between its suppliers, partners and customers for procurement and delivery of goods. Suppliers and partners belonging to another enterprise could not join this private chain.
“Some companies approach blockchain purely because of their fascination with technology. This is a recipe for failure.”
2. “Blockchain is emerging technology; it's cool. Let us implement it for tech’s sake.”
Some companies approach blockchain purely because of their fascination with technology. This is a recipe for failure.
Business outcomes should lead blockchain implementations. But software and platform industries releasing ever more advanced blockchain versions fueled this tech fascination.
Blockchain implementations, both public and private, however, will be successful only when implemented to:
These four attributes can address millions of problems in any form of interaction — B2B, B2C, P2P, machine-to-peer or machine-to-machine.
There is a tendency to dismiss private blockchain as a flat file or database that is nothing but old technology. Public blockchain also uses established components like C++ (for Bitcoin, invented in 1985), asymmetric encryption (invented in 1976), Proof of Work (invented in 1993) and SHA 256 (invented in 2001).
When these different technologies came together, they solved the double-counting problem in money applications, which computer scientists had struggled to solve since the early 1980s, through the invention of Bitcoin in 2008.
Indeed, at this stage, private blockchain should solve tough business problems mainly when other technologies fail. Otherwise, blockchain initiatives will fail and discourage people from using or exploring them.
“Enterprises can benefit significantly through private blockchain by starting their own chain.”
3. “To use blockchain, an industry-wide consortium is required. Someone else needs to start the chain, and we will join it.”
There is a widespread misconception that for blockchain to be useful everyone in an industry needs to be a part of it. Enterprises think that since it’s a consortium someone else needs to take a lead, start the chain and establish a code of practice for its effective function — and that once these are accomplished, they can join the consortium. This is incorrect.
Based on our experience of implementing blockchain for several industries globally, enterprises can benefit significantly through private blockchain by starting their own chain. The approach here is DIY rather than DIFM (“do it for me”).
These are very effective in addressing gaps in trust, which can increase when there is an interplay between companies, suppliers, partners and customers to accomplish common objectives and goals. The value of such a chain to a company increases even more when the interaction involves a combination of legacy and non-legacy systems leading to different information islands or silos that don’t talk to each other.
Hence companies spend a lot of time and effort on data or information reconciliation that blockchain could alleviate. As such, these own chains can deliver tremendous collaborative benefits and achieve positive network effects.
“Now is the time for enterprises to build and use their own chains to drive transformation, whether physical processes or digital operations.”
We have deployed these chains in various enterprises to solve business problems such as:
In essence, now is the time for enterprises to build and use their own chains to drive transformation, whether physical processes or digital operations.
Republished with permission, this article first appeared on World Economic Forum.
Longitudes explores and navigates the trends reshaping the global economy and the way we’ll live in the world of tomorrow: logistics, technology, e-commerce, trade and sustainability. Which path will you take?